Gavaskar Critiques Pant’s Risky Shot Selection

The performance of Rishabh Pant during the third morning of the Test match between India and Australia at the Melbourne Cricket Ground has come under scrutiny, particularly due to his choice of shot that resulted in his dismissal. Pant showcased an early sense of rhythm, scoring 28 runs off 37 deliveries alongside Ravindra Jadeja as they continued India’s innings from an overnight score of 164 for 5. Their partnership offered promising signs as they navigated the initial phase of play with relative ease.

However, the situation took a turn when Pant opted for an unorthodox scoop shot against Australian bowler Scott Boland, aiming to direct the ball towards the leg side. This reckless decision ultimately led to a straightforward catch for the fielder positioned at deep third man, a move that has drawn criticism from former Indian captain Sunil Gavaskar. Gavaskar noted that while Pant had successfully executed similar shots in less congested field conditions, this particular attempt not only failed but also showed a grave misjudgment of the game’s context. He highlighted the presence of two fielders stationed in the deep as a clear indication that such a shot was unwise.

Further analysis revealed that this was not the first attempt of its kind from Pant during the over. He had made a similar attempt just a ball earlier, which resulted in him inside-edging the ball into his own body due to his loss of balance. Although he had connected slightly better on the next delivery, the shot concluded with him getting caught by Nathan Lyon. His dismissal left India at 191 for 5, still trailing by a significant margin of 283 runs. However, Nitish Kumar Reddy and Washington Sundar were building a promising partnership, ensuring that India still had a fighting chance in the match.

Gavaskar pointed out that while Pant is known for his aggressive batting style and ability to score runs through unconventional methods, his shot selection raises concerns at the Test level. He emphasized the importance of being discerning in shot choice, particularly when field placements already suggest a high risk of dismissal. Gavaskar expressed that if Pant’s primary strategy is to score through boundary-driven tactics without adapting to the current match situation, then he must reassess his batting position in the order. He asserted that such a mindset is not conducive to success in Test cricket, where the competition demands an understanding of situational requirements.

In a live commentary session, Gavaskar voiced his frustration at the manner in which Pant had dismissed himself, labeling it as a significant letdown for the Indian team. His reaction underscored a broader expectation among cricketers and fans alike: players must remain aware of the game’s dynamics, particularly in high-pressure scenarios. The decision to play an aggressive shot like the one Pant attempted, especially with two fielders already stationed in the area where the ball eventually landed, was both illogical and indicative of a deeper issue regarding shot selection.

Gavaskar emphasized the necessity of adapting one’s game based on match conditions. While believing in one’s natural style is important, players must also accept that Test cricket is fundamentally different from limited-overs formats, where risk-taking can yield more immediate rewards. The balance between aggression and caution becomes vital, and in this instance, Pant’s choice starkly contrasted with the strategic thinking that successful Test batting encompasses.

The discourse surrounding Pant’s innings not only highlights individual performance but also serves as a reminder of the collective responsibility players bear for the fate of their team. In the context of India’s broader strategy in the ongoing series, embracing a more calculated approach with careful shot selection becomes essential for success.

Understanding when to play aggressively and when to display restraint will be critical as India navigates further challenges in the series. The lesson from Pant’s dismissal is clear: while attacking cricket is fundamental to the Indian ethos, it should never come at the cost of situational awareness and composure on the cricket field.

As India continues its quest for victory against Australia, the need for disciplined batting becomes paramount. The ability to adapt one’s game to the circumstances—recognizing when to assert oneself and when to exhibit caution—is a hallmark of great Test cricketers. Rishabh Pant, with a wealth of talent, must embrace this complexity in his approach moving forward.

What you should read next: