Oilers’ Stuart Skinner Goalie Decision Looks Awkward Now

Hockey has a funny way of changing the story on a player. One month, a guy is the problem. The next month, he’s somewhere else, and suddenly he looks pretty much the same as he always did. That’s kind of what’s happening right now with Stuart Skinner.

The Oilers Traded Skinner Because They Needed “Something Different”

When the Edmonton Oilers moved on from Skinner, the feeling around the team seemed pretty clear. They needed something different in the crease. It happens. When a team isn’t getting the results it wants, the goalie is usually the first domino to fall.

Skinner’s stats since moving to Pittsburgh really add an interesting twist to the story. While with Edmonton this season, he had a goals-against average of 2.83 over 23 games, allowing 62 goals on 508 shots. It’s not amazing, but it’s not a complete trainwreck either, especially given that he was playing behind a defence that wasn’t exactly rock solid.

Now with the Penguins, the stat line looks a little different. In 17 games, his GAA is sitting at 2.70. He’s faced 377 shots and allowed 46 goals. The save percentage is identical at .891, which is probably the most telling part of all this.

Skinner Is Basically the Same Goalie He Always Was

In other words, the goalie didn’t magically change. Skinner is basically the same guy. And that’s where things start to get a little ironic when you look back at how the whole situation unfolded in Edmonton.

The Oilers have had their share of chaos this season. Big expectations, a loud market, and a team that knows its championship window doesn’t stay open forever. When things start wobbling in that kind of environment, frustration shows up quickly. Players get tense. Mistakes pile up. The puck ends up in your net, and everyone starts pointing fingers.

Goalies tend to absorb a lot of that blame. Sometimes they deserve it. Sometimes they’re just the last guy people notice after three defensive mistakes in front of them.

Skinner Looks Different in Pittsburgh

Watching Skinner in Pittsburgh so far, he looks pretty much like the goalie people expected him to be all along. Calm. Solid enough. Not a superstar, but certainly good enough to give a team a chance most nights.

But his time there has been different. The Penguins have also given him something the Oilers weren’t always providing: a little more stability in front of him. It doesn’t take much for a goalie’s numbers to improve. One fewer odd-man rush a night. One fewer blown coverage. Suddenly, that goals-against average drops a little, and the story changes.

So Here’s the Question Oilers’ Fans Are Left With

That’s why this whole thing raises a fair question. Was Skinner actually the issue in Edmonton? Or was he just the easiest piece to change when the team needed to feel like it was doing something?

Stan Bowman was all about saying the Oilers needed “something different.” Was he onto something? Sometimes, a team just needs a little jolt to lift the spirits. But watching Skinner play steady, drama-free hockey in Pittsburgh makes you wonder if the Oilers were tackling the wrong problem.

Goalies are funny that way. Throw them into the middle of chaos, and they look overwhelmed. Go figure. Put them behind a calmer system, and suddenly they seem perfectly capable again.

Skinner’s Sample Size Is Small in Pittsburgh

Seventeen games with the Penguins isn’t enough to settle the debate. A couple of bad nights could flip the numbers in a hurry. Goalies live on that kind of razor’s edge. Still, the early returns are enough to plant a small seed of doubt.

As Skinner keeps performing well in Pittsburgh, the Oilers might have to tackle a tricky question: Was he really the one to blame after all?

Related: Injury Update: Oilers’ Ingram After Collision with Nathan MacKinnon