Shamik Chakrabarty, Mumbai
Not many moons ago, Suryakumar Yadav was topping the ICC T20I batting charts. Over the last year-and-a-half, however, there has been a sharp decline. Between January 1, 2025 and the T20 World Cup this year, India’s T20I captain has played 35 international matches in the shortest format, scoring 702 runs at an average of 26.00 — down from his career average of 36.35.
At the T20 World Cup in February-March this year, Surya started off with a match-winning knock against the USA. But he couldn’t keep the momentum going, finishing with 242 runs from nine matches at an average of 30.25 and a strike-rate of 136.72. India won the Cup and Surya’s dip in form slipped under the radar. But a new T20I cycle will begin after the ongoing IPL and notwithstanding that Surya is a World Cup-winning captain, whether he is pulling his weight as a batsman is a pertinent question. He is not having a great IPL either, while Shreyas Iyer and Rajat Patidar have been setting the stands alight. Shreyas is also leading Punjab Kings brilliantly. So Surya will have to regain his mojo quickly, else he might find himself on a slippery slope.
Research and analysis done by renowned coach Zubin Bharucha and Cricket 21 attest Surya’s batting travails…
Suryakumar Yadav — No. 3/No. 4 Position Assessment
Explosive innings frequency, form trajectory and ranking against Shreyas Iyer and Rajat Patidar at No. 3-No. 4
Explosive Innings: Career Reputation vs Recent Reality
Suryakumar Yadav’s career record of 11 innings at 40+ runs and 200+ strike-rate is unmatched in the IPL history. But the since 2025, data at No. 3-No. 4, which is the relevant performance window, tells a different story. Among the four batters who produce explosive knocks with any regularity, Surya ranks last on frequency: Nicholas Pooran 4/14 (28.6%), Shreyas 4/19 (21.1%), Patidar 3/17 (17.6%), and Surya 3/20 (15%). Shreyas and Patidar both detonate more often from the same positions across a comparable number of innings.
The dividing line between detonators and accumulators at No. 3-No. 4 remains stark — Jos Buttler has zero explosive knocks from 17 innings and 714 runs, Rishabh Pant zero from 14, KL Rahul zero from 9 — so Surya is firmly in the detonator category. But within that category, he is not the most frequent. His career reputation as the IPL’s most explosive No. 3-No. 4 batter is built on the 2021–2024 peak. In the current window, both Shreyas and Patidar produce the signature knock more often.
| 40+/200+ frequency at #3-4 since 2025: Pooran 4/14 (28.6%) | Shreyas 4/19 (21.1) | Patidar 3/17 (17.6%) | SKY 3/20 (15%) | Buttler 0/17 | Pant 0/14 |
Form Against Quality Attacks: A Three-Month Decline
Surya’s last 20 T20 innings aggregate to 607 runs at 35.71 and a strike-rate of 156.8 — a line inflated by performances against weak opposition. Strip out USA, Zimbabwe, Netherlands and Namibia, and the record against quality bowling reads: 5 and 12 versus South Africa, 32 off 29 versus Pakistan (110.3 SR), 18 off 16 versus West Indies, 11 off 6 versus England — 78 runs from 5 innings, average under 16. The 82 not out and 63 against New Zealand in January were genuine, but nothing since has confirmed that level.
The IPL 2026 extends the decline. Four innings have yielded 106 runs with just one score above 33. The 51 vs Delhi Capitals at No. 4 came at a strike-rate of 141.7 — a grind by his standards. Two quick dismissals (6 off 3, 16 off 8) and an anonymous 33 off 22 versus Royal Challengers Bengaluru. The explosive knock of substance has not arrived against any quality attack since late January. This is not a thin-sample concern — it is a sustained absence spanning three months across international and IPL opposition.
| Vs quality attacks since late Jan 2026: 78 runs from 5 T20I innings (avg under 16) + 106 from 4 IPL innings (1 score above 33). No explosive knock of substance in 3 months. |
The Case for Shreyas and Patidar Ahead of SKY
Shreyas Iyer is ahead on every dimension that matters:
From 19 innings at No. 3-No. 4: average 54.69 (near-identical to Surya’s 54.87), strike-rate 180.9 versus Surya’s 165.9 — a 15-point gap — and a 21.1% explosive innings rate versus 15%. He matches Surya’s consistency while operating at a materially higher gear. The run tally difference (711 vs 823) is one extra innings of output, not a structural advantage. On the metrics that define a No. 3-No. 4’s value in T20 cricket — the ability to score at pace while maintaining a high floor — Shreyas is the superior option in the current window.
Patidar’s case is different in kind. His average of 33.73 from 17 innings is a lower floor than Surya, but his explosive rate of 17.6% exceeds Surya’s 15%, his strike-rate of 165.9 is identical, and his boundary metrics (BPB 4.49, Bdry% 66.4%) are comparable. Patidar offers a higher frequency of match-breaking innings from the same positions at the same strike rate. The trade-off is reliability between those peaks — but if the question is which batter is more likely to produce the innings that wins a knockout match, Patidar’s recent rate is ahead.
Surya’s 54.87 average is the strongest counter-argument, but it is increasingly a lagging indicator. It is anchored by a dominant IPL 2025 that has not been replicated. Against quality attacks since late January 2026, the signature ability has not been evident. If the average continues to be carried by historic form rather than current output, the gap between SKY and both Shreyas and Patidar on the metrics that matter — strike-rate, explosive frequency, and present-day form — will only widen.
| Shreyas: same average, 15-point SR advantage, higher explosive rate. Patidar: higher explosive rate at identical SR. SKY’s average is a lagging indicator from the 2025 peak. On current trajectory, both are ahead of him at #3-4. |
(Data courtesy, and also research and analysis done by Zubin Bharucha and Cricket 21)
Follow Revsportz for latest sports news