MVP Calls Out Triple H For Rarely Elevating WWE Talent

MVP is doubling down on his criticism of Triple H — and this time, he’s going directly after his reputation for creating stars.

While speaking on his Marking Out podcast, MVP compared Triple H directly to The Undertaker and argued that Undertaker consistently elevated talent throughout multiple generations, while Triple H rarely gave that same rub to other wrestlers.

MVP started by explaining that when fans look back at Undertaker’s career, there are numerous names tied to wrestlers who became bigger stars after working with him. He then challenged people to come up with a similar list connected to Triple H.

“You can go down the list and you can think of talents that Taker worked with that he elevated and got them over. How many people do you remember ‘The Nose’ getting over—I mean Triple H in his career? How many people can you associate with him? And I’ll give you two. I’ll give you Randy. I’ll give you Batista. Who else can you remember Triple Nose getting over?”

MVP then pointed to Jeff Hardy as an example of someone he believes never fully received the type of loss reaction that truly elevates a babyface star. According to MVP, even in defeat Triple H still made sure attention remained on himself instead of completely selling Hardy’s victory.

“Jeff Hardy—I remember the finish because, you know, it was a three count and he sat up smiling like, ‘Gosh, golly, he got me,’ you know. Not, ‘Boom—oh man, I’m hurt—oh man.’ He—I know the man, I worked with the man.”

MVP continued by making it clear that his criticism comes from firsthand experience working around Triple H backstage and understanding how he operated politically during his career.

“Your ego—I mean, your opinion versus my experience are very different. He wouldn’t even give that to Jeff Hardy where, ‘Oh man, he beat me.’ He got up, sat up, and like, ‘He got me,’ you know.”

From there, MVP widened the comparison between Triple H and Undertaker by arguing that helping build future stars should matter just as much as personal accomplishments. He acknowledged both men were major stars and huge draws, but said Undertaker’s willingness to elevate others made him far more valuable overall.

“So, Triple H—top guy, drew a lot of money, was a player. Undertaker—top guy, drew a lot of money, was a player. If Undertaker made, let’s just say for the sake of our conversation, through the course of his career, 10 other guys, and The Nose got two or three other guys over that he elevated them—in the big scheme of things, the big picture, who was more valuable for the company?”

MVP then answered his own question and blamed ego for why some top wrestlers fail to properly elevate younger talent.

“Well, it would be Undertaker. The guy who was a top guy who knew how to get himself over and get other people over—that’s the problem, because you have guys that have that ego where it’s all about me. It’s all about me—uh.”

The latest comments continue MVP’s recent pattern of publicly criticizing WWE and Triple H. Back in late 2025, MVP also praised Tony Khan while describing WWE under Triple H as far more corporate and fear-driven compared to AEW’s locker room environment.

So, MVP isn’t just criticizing Triple H’s leadership style anymore. He’s now openly questioning Triple H’s long-term value as a top star compared to legends like Undertaker, arguing that truly great wrestlers help create future stars instead of keeping the focus on themselves.